Captain, this planet is hostile!


In what seems to be a prequel to War of the Worlds, the R3 thread on Zerotohundred has been invaded by hostile aliens for over a week. Seemingly endless fighting between naysayers and non-believers of the R3 (Race Rally Research, Motorsports Division of Proton) movement and SR3 owners and its supporters have brought much intensity and colour to the recent spate of dullness in the thread. Apparent unhappiness with Proton as a whole and accusations that the Satria R3 is a mere rebadged, hasty snap-on job by Proton Motorsports to clear inventory, has sparked some fiery debates. Some backed by facts and constructive opinions. However, many baseless accusations, blatant flaming and below-the-belt personal attacks have ensued.

Efforts to diffuse the intensity has so far been futile as personal insults, at times involving fathers, mothers and the family dog, litter the thread.

I find it amusing how one car can cause such controversy. I’ve heard that no publicity is bad publicity, but this borders on the ridiculous! True, the Satria is a rebadged Mitsubishi Colt sourced from Mitsubishi Motors Corporation (MMC), and has been around for at least one and a half decade. And true, if my math skills have not failed me, it is an old platform.

Having said that, R3 simply took a tried and tested platform (the Satria platform is still raced in some countries) and improved on it. And thus the Satria R3 was born. Out of the intention to release a performance-bred, no-frills car for the enthusiast. This is the first effort, mind you. Without sounding like a kiss-ass Proton groupie, I’d say it is a good effort, though far from perfect. The AMG, M3, Brabus, Ralliart, Honda Type-R and Nismo comparisons are unfair for the 20-man strong outfit which probably had their fair share of hell with corporate Proton just to see the project through.

The Arguments
This is so typical of Proton, taking an old car, giving it a bodykit and new rims, then selling it as a new ‘special edition’. Look at the Proton Saga SE, Wira SE, Satria SE. Same old bloody engine! Same with the Satria R3. And it’s expensive! Anyone could have given it a SGTi bodykit, Recaro seats, MOMO steering, big brakes and suspension. What a rip-off!

Why use an aged platform when Proton has the Waja, Gen.2 and Savvy to work its magic on? From a purely enthusiast point of view, R3 took a base platform that worked, improved it, redefined how it performed and handled, then marketed it as Proton’s first official performance-bred product. The key word here is ‘factory-backed’. Reassuringly, a car with performance parts fitted that is backed by factory warranty. And 2 years at that.

The Satria/Colt/Mirage platform has been around for quite a while. This translates into plenty of spare parts, and availability of aftermarket modifications, many local. It makes perfect sense from a business point of view to make full use of the platform. From the bodywork, to carbon fibre bits, exhaust system, strut bars and suspension components, the SR3 consists of parts developed by well-known local tuners.

Remember, this is R3’s first effort. The Savvy R3 Concept already shows that R3 is serious about its upcoming projects. From way back when the Satria R3 was first conceived, it was said that the ‘R3 treatment’ would be applied to every single product in Proton’s stable. R3 versions of the Gen.2, Waja, SRM and PRM should see the light of day in the near future.

The Satria R3 isn’t just a slap-on job. It took research and development and lots of testing to get the level of performance it proudly bears at this point. Mods you do not see, like the spot-welding of the chassis translates to a great handling car. When you look at the SR3 as a whole package, I dare say you will not find a comparable performance-based new car at that price point, local or otherwise. At RM78K, it’s just a RM5K premium over the more luxury-based SGTi.

My SGTi does 7.8seconds in the century sprint. Why is the lighter, more expensive SR3 slower than its predecessor coming in at slow-poke 8.6seconds?

Without insulting any SGTi owners, it is a well-known fact that the original manufacturer claimed performance figures of 7.8seconds for the century sprint is over-optimistic. Even with the more powerful MMC ECU-based EMS, pre-2001 SGTis manage around 9seconds at best. Siemens-based SGTis are a tad slower at 9.3s, mostly due to emission standards compliance. Looking at the math, the power-to-weight ratio of the SR3 is simply more superior as compared to any SGTi, be it MMC or Siemens-based. Quoted power output figures of 105kW, is also slightly higher than its SGTi variants (103kW).

To summarize, the 8.6seconds 0-100km/h is a proven, honest-to-God figure. No over-optimistic marketing bullshit. This has also been backed by dynos amongst some SR3 owners. 120whp, true to spec.

Don’t buy the SR3. It’s a waste of money. Better off spending the money to buy a Avanza. Or a MyVI. Or buy a 2nd hand 1.3litre Satria, stuff in all the goodies and you will still have cash to spare for 2 teh tariks and indomie rebus (with telor mata kerbau some more!)

If you think buying a 1.3litre Satria, seam-welding it then stuffing in equivalent or better performance bits into it is a smarter idea, then go ahead. But it won’t be a new car. And ever heard of chassis fatigue? How about manufacturer backed warranty? No? Ok. One could easily tread this route, as do many, but look at it this way, R3 has done the R&D and packaged the SR3 with attractive, proven bits of kit. It also is giving you 2 years worth of warranty and support. It is also giving you exclusivity with the rest of the 149 owners.

The MyVI and the Avanza are good cars in their own right. But they are NOT performance cars. It is silly for the SR3 to be compared to these cars. Different target market. Different requirements.

Still not convinced?
Let me tell you why I like the SR3. I’ll break it down to 10 principal reasons just to keep it short and sweet. Alrighty, this is Verne’s SR3 Top 10 List:

Numero uno – the handling. It is an excellent handler with different characteristics to a SGTi. The SGTi is a good handler too, no doubt, but has handles different. This is apparent when you observe how a SGTi takes a corner as opposed to a SR3. The pitch, the roll. Different. Strut bars, custom damping, bigger front anti-roll bars, 10mm drop in ride height. They all contribute to the superior ride and handling. The damping of the SR3 is not overly stiff. Some people are shocked at the damping rates – just 2.5kgs front and 1.8kgs rear.

No. 2 – Better brakes. The front and rear cross-drilled discs coupled with Mintex is brilliant.

No. 3 – Top class steering feel. This is a major plus. No feeling of lifeless, over-assisted power steering. This is what is lacking in most cars. The feel is direct, much like driving a go-kart. Autoworld Malaysia likened it to driving a Mini. Direct, point-and-steer. Brilliant.

No. 4 – Better seats. The Recaro SR4 is firm and offers excellent support.

No. 5 – The Momo Tuner steering with supplied boss kit.

No. 6 – The stock anodised front and rear strut bars.

No. 7 – The rubber. Yokohama Advan AD07s are the stickiest road tyres in the market. Nothing comes close. FYI, the whole ride and handling feel of the SR3 was developed around the AD07s which is what gives it the confidence and grip on the tarmac.

No. 8 – The lightweight 16″ Advanti rims. Less unsprung weight translates to a lighter and more responsive car overall.

No. 9 – The full exhaust system. The tuned length stainless steel 4-2-1 header all the way to the cat bypass pipe to the free flow piping. Slightly bassy and pretty quiet at idle. Being non-restrictive, this is a performance feature.

No. 10 – The CF bits – carbon fibre spoiler and cam cover. Lightweight and trick-looking.

Notice that I haven’t really mentioned anything cosmetic. This is simply because the SR3 isn’t about bling-bling. Not that it is not aesthetically pleasing. It’s not about being a chick-magnet although to a certain extent it is. It isn’t about looks and making people’s heads turn when you swing by. It’s about driving. And true to its claim, it is a driving experience to savour. Every single time you step on the fun pedal and swing it through those tight bends. The looks, in every sense of word, in understated. No unneccessary body extensions and accessories. And yet, it does have presence.

IA - Yoodo

By Vernon

Vernon is the founder and chief editor of A graphic designer by profession, he has a deep love for technology, cars, gadgets, food, and travel. He tweets too much and is also known as a caffeine bacterium ("life's too short for bad coffee"). Bleeds Blue (go Chelsea FC!) and considers BMW, Porsche, Alfa Romeo cars to have in the garage--for true petrolheads, that is.

3 replies on “Captain, this planet is hostile!”


I wish I had 80k to spend on any car. 🙂

I think those that slag off the R3 etc have owned a proton car at least and they are venting their disappointment in Proton and not with the car.

I am one of them so I know. BUt since Vernon loves his R3, go ahead. Every dog to his bone. My bone would be the 106Gti. Loved that car. A real big ball tester car. The more you pushed it, the more it would bark back and say, … is that all? Come on, give me more !!!

That said from the many cars I have tested, NONE have made me smile more, laugh more, grin more, look back at the car after parking more, always picking up the keys more, inviting more friends for a ride, more friends saying that is one car they all would love to buy…. ! It was a real hoot.

Sadly nowadays I just can’t find that enjoyment anymore and boy do I miss that little pug 106Gti in Diablo red. Its like the first girlfriend I had,… I can never forget.

As for my current ride, if I could get ride of it, I would and I would NEVER miss any of it. Ok I am lying here. I will miss the Recaro seats. Thats all.

cheers! Recaro rocks!


Well, let’s just say those who figure “why bother?” probably already bought a GTi, Putra, EG and so forth. “Why bother? Answer: Been there done that” But for the rest of us with 80k to spare on a new sports car which requires little or no modding to worry about; just play out of the box, the Satria R3 is it.

But you’re right, it’s not selling like hot cakes. I’d assume it’s because people are judging it as a 15yr old design that’s been modified. Sadly, why don’t these people see the EK9 as a modified EK4? It’s pretty much what an R3 is to a GTi, really. In fact, some GTi Club members used to dub the R3 as a GTi Type-R.

Testing? A production car is taken for a >>30,000km almost non-stop reliability cum wear/tear run for a start. For the performance/handling bits; dynos, sprint/topspeed measurements and track times. Crash testing the Satria has probably been done 15yrs ago already. I really would like to know what else there is to test.

Do note the SR3 despite all the hype, I do not consider that it sold like hot cakes. I bet they are still selling it on the website. Goes to show that despite it being limited edition, there are many wise people out there that would not take proton hype.

Just my view Vernon. YOu love the car by the looks of it and good for you. YOu spent a good deal of dosh on it. BUt there are many out there that figure why bother? Did Proton really test everything out or just go out and buy good stuff and slap it on.

The only thing diff is the extra welding the SR3 got but everything else is just at the end of the day, modifications. Anyone could do it and with Lotus behind, well the handling would have been the easiest to sort.

I think I know why there are people that suggest taking a 1.3 and doing it up. At the end of it all, it would be car 001 out of 001… ie truly limited and unique.

My point being, there will always be the other side of the coin and like all petrol heads, the debate will never die…my car is better than yours.:-)

Note: I agree that my Sgti is lousier than your SR3. That I accept.


Comments are closed.